SKY SHARKS!!!

January 4th, 2010
A Merlin in a tree outside my office window in Wilsall, Montana.  Taken 26 December, 2009.

A falcon in a tree outside my office window in Wilsall, Montana. Taken 26 December, 2009.

We have had falcons as transient residents in our area off and on over the last 15 years.  Normally, they show up and hang around for a couple of days and then move on.  However, we recently have had one arrive who has claimed our house as a part of its territory.  Falcons are generally small hawks that are specialized to feed on other birds.  They flush other birds from their perches, and then catch them on the wing.  They typically kill the prey immediately with a bite at the base of the skull severing the spinal cord.  Then they may land nearby and proceed to pluck and consume their prey.
 
The falcons are beautiful examples of an avian predator, and just simply gorgeous to boot, albeit I suspect their prey would beg to differ on both of these points. Of course, any reader who  has followed this irregular blog over the last few years knows that we have several bird feeders.  
 
At our feeders, depending upon the season we may have a couple of dozen types of birds present.  In the winter, i. e., NOW, we have numerous small finches such as rosy finches, and American house finches,  other small birds, such as chickadees, and a few larger birds, such as flickers and some collared doves.  The last named are exotic birds that seem to have invaded the area in the past few years.  They are quite good-sized birds, about the size of the standard urban sky rat, and about as desireable, in my opinion.  Although they are relatively attractive, they drive off our native morning doves, and their call is raucous and unpleasant. 
 
Maintaining bird-feeders, however, in essence, is “chumming” for our small sky sharks, the falcons.  Amongst the largest common birds at the feeders are these doves.  And our various falcons appear to consider them as prime vittles.  The falcons that we have seen most commonly are merlins, blazingly fast birds.  However, merlins are small enough that the doves are too large to be captured often.  The merlins seem to eat other birds, such as finches.  
A Merlin perching on our fence,  taken in the summer a few years ago

A Merlin perching on our fence, taken in the summer a few years ago. Merlins are small birds, about 25 cm (10 inches) in height.

The merlins perch all around our house, in trees and in shrubs.  One gets a feeling for how agile these little birds are by watching fly at full speed INSIDE a hedge to catch their prey.
The merlin in the tree out front.  This is the same bird that is shown in the first image in this blog.

Our newest falcon is the above bird, which we think is a Prairie Falcon in the poplar tree out front. This is the same bird that is shown in the first image in this blog. It is much larger than our usual merlins, and has somewhat different coloration.

 Unfortunately, Prairie Falcons, and other transient falcons, found from time to time locally have several geographic "races" and coloration patterns, so it is hard to pin down precisely what it it.  This bird is also pictured in the first image of this post and the one below.  This bird has been around for a month, maybe.  We have seen it “in passing;”  but not frequently nor long enough to to get a good look.  That all changed around last Christmas, when it seemed to decide this was a good place to hunt.  Although it may look like the first and third images in this post are taken in moderate weather, that is not the case, those images were taken a few minutes apart and only an hour or so before the one below.  Lots of snow on the ground and not much in way of nice weather.

My wife and I were sitting in our home theater when we heard a loud crash on the side of the house and we ran out to the adjacent room where we saw a smudge outlined by small downy feathers on a large window; looking out of the window to the adjacent yard we saw the falcon in the process of plucking the feathers off the dove’s body and consuming it.  I didn’t want to cause the bird to leave his, obviously, hard won prey, so I didn’t try to get a better angle for the image of his feeding.  He was a most efficient diner.  He had finished with the dove within about 15 minutes where upon he left.   A neighbor’s cat and a scavenging magpie both examined the remains of the kill within the next few minutes, but neither of them found enough remains there to make it worth their trouble to try to eat it. 

The falcon on the remains of its prey.  It was in the neighboring yard, on the other side of our chainlink fence.  The prey was a dove, and had been killed about 2 minutes before.

The Prairie Falcon on the remains of its prey. It was in the neighboring yard, on the other side of our chainlink fence. The prey was a collared dove, and had been killed about 2 minutes before. The falcon appeared to stand about 50 cm (18 inches high).

The following day, while walking around the yard, I found one more site where a dove had been consumed.   Watching this beautiful predator in action  has been a great experience for my wife and I – probably less pleasant for the doves, though.

Sorry for the delay

With all the best intentions, health issues again intervened in my schedule of blogging.  I have been doing some further work on my Diodogorgia feeding movies – and in fact I am actually getting about done with the first phase of the analyses.  I hope to post some movies about the feeding before long. 

Until next time, take care and have a belated, but heartfelt HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Cheers….

On The Wall

October 21st, 2009

Background

Over the last 4 years, or so, I have converted my 55 gallon ”reef” aquarium into a holding/maintenance tank for the Diodogorgia nodulifera specimens that I was using in my research project.  I turned the tank into a laminar flow system designed to keep the gorgonians alive, and it worked pretty well.  The gorgonians survived, indeed, they grew and apparently thrived –  up to a point.  The problem turned out not to be the system nor their foods, but the means of fasting them into the acrylic blocks I used for specimen mounting.  I tried several ways of gluing them into these blocks, mostly using super glue gel.  This material worked very well at holding the specimens into the blocks.  However, it also seemed to inhibit grow of the animal’s adjacent tissues.  After a few months, the specimen would break off the specimen holder, and I could not induce the specimens to grow new tissue at the base.  Eventually, even though the colonies would be growing at the distal ends, they would die from the base up. 

I am now analysing the data from those experiments, and I hope to be done with those analyses within a few months.  Health issues have prevented me from working on the project to get a timely publication, but I still anticipate a publication. 

During the duration of the project’s experimental phase, I added very few animals to the system.  Basically, I just set it up well and fed it.  It was a low light system; the Diodogorgia did not need illumination, so I decided to do without the extra expense of a lot of “reef-aquarium”  lights.  I added a small bank of T-5 lighting to simply provide illumination for observation.  No livestock was added during this period.  The tank was fish free, as all good tanks should be. :-)

Over the past couple of weeks I started bringing the system up to a more aesthetic level; a friend has very kindly offered to send me one of the clones of her beautiful rose Entacmaea quadricolor, and I thought this would make a good starting point for a more attractive tank in my office/lab.  Whilst I am changing the inhabitants of the system a bit, I don’t intend to alter the system rapidly or significantly with the exception of adding a new skimmer.   I put the skimmer online a couple of days ago, and it seems to be working just fine.

During the last few years, I have watched, but not really documented, some of the changes in my system.  One of the more interesting of these changes has been the development of a couple of “walls” consisting of masses of calcareous sponges, large hydroids and some large vermetid gastropods.  The hydroids were probably feeding on the excess Artemia I was using to feed the Diodogorgia, while the sponges and vermetids  were feeding on all sorts of particulate in the water.  For the last 3 years, the standard feeding regimen of the system was 2 Liters of Artemia culture enriched with DT’s phytoplankton added daily.  Every week or so, I would also add a bit of diced lance fish to maintain the scavenger population of my sand bed.   That was it for food.    This food sufficed for the gorgonians, but it really was a low nutirent load for this system.  During most of this period, the skimmer that was on the system produced almost nothing.  Eventually, due to a pump failure, I changed the plumbing of the tank, and ditched the skimmer altogether. 

The Wall Fauna

I spent a few hours yesterday pleasurably looking at a rock or two from the system; and saw that the rocks were covered in a dense epifaunal and epifloral layer.

Below are some images of a group of the athecate hydroids found in my system.  The term “athecate” refers to the body of the hydroid and its lack of a “exoskeletal” covering.  Those hydroids that have such a covering are called “thecate” hydroids, those without are “athecate.”   The stalk that connects the body to the substrate is covered in a proteinaceous covering near the substrate; that covering is visible in the images below.  In the lowermost image, the covering has some red cyanobacteria on it.

A group of the athecate hydroids found in my system.  They are about 5 mm high.

A group of the athecate hydroids found in my system. They are about 5 mm high.

Athecate hydroid showing the tentacle ring surrounding the mouth.  The total span across the tentacles was about 1 cm.

Athecate hydroid showing the tentacle ring surrounding the mouth. The total span across the tentacles was about 1 cm.

Athecate hydroid, notice the two "pseudo-planula" buds hanging from the body. The animal was about 4-5 mm long.

Athecate hydroid, notice the two "pseudo-planula" buds hanging from the body. The animal was about 4-5 mm long.

The small calcareous sponges that hobbyists often refer to as Scypha, are very common on my system’s rocks.  Generally, they have the small cylindrical or barrel-shaped appearance that is typical, but there were a few that were quite long and tubular, laying on the rocks.  These latter individuals were very fragile, but were apparently alive.  I have seen such sponges draped over the rocks in some areas in the Pacific Northwest, but this was the first time I have seen them in an aquarium.
A calcareous sponge of the type often referred to as "Scypha."  This sponge was about 3-4 mm high.

A calcareous sponge of the type often referred to as "Scypha." This sponge was about 3-4 mm high.

The red, coral-like foraminiferan, Homotrema rubrum was abundant on the rocks as well.  The largest examples were about a centimeter in diameter. 
A group of the red foraminiferan, Homotrema rubrum.  As might be expected these suspension-feeding protozoans were very abundant on the rocks.

A group of the red foraminiferan, Homotrema rubrum. As might be expected these suspension-feeding protozoans were very abundant on the rocks.

I hope to get some more images of the wall fauna in over the next few days, and if I do I will them to the blog in subsequent posts.
Until then…
Cheers!!!

I’m Back…

October 11th, 2009

Sigh. 

Well, I could go into a great deal of verbiage about why I haven’t posted over the last month.  I could, but I won’t.  The short story is that my wife wanted to do a make over of her room in our little house, and I thought this was a great idea.  Unfortunately, her health – primarily her stamina – was not up to the task and, so. about 6 weeks ago I said I would do this for her.  This was a “labor of love” – no griping, complaining, bitching or such on my part.  I really wanted to do this and to do a good job for her, she deserved it. 

The room modification is now in the last phases, and those will last for months as the last additions/changes are put in place, and those will all be her doing.  I may help, but only at her direction.  So my major effor is done.  And major effort it was.  There were a series of problems, none of them were particularly of our doing – things like two containers of paint, mixed at the same time, in the same store, by the same person that were decidedly differernt colors when they dried.  And so and on.  By the time I was done, enough new coats of paint had been added to some parts of the room that the walls were measurably closer together.

I discovered that going up and down, on and off ladders and concentrating on painting was very draining.  Draining to the point that I was and still am physically exhausted.  The short end of the story was that I was simply not able to put together a good blog entry.  Hell, I was barely able to move, and creative thinking was a real trial.

But it is done, and I will be back in business this coming week.  Look for a post or two.

Until then,

Cheers!!!

When In Worry…

September 8th, 2009

The ditty goes:

“When in worry,

When in doubt,

Run in circles,

Scream and Shout!

Great advice, generally followed by my students before my “notoriously” hard Invertebrate Zoology midterms, or politicians virtually all of the time.  And although harmless advice – from the point-of-view of the onlooker-  it really serves no purpose other than to entertain the bystanders.  This type of entertainment was perhaps the only worthwhile aspect to the entire GWB pseudo-presidency.

Around me, particularly, and our household, in general, these past couple of weeks have been a continuing series of greater-east-asian-fire-emergency-procedure-training-exercises, what in the Ungood Old Days we called, “Chinese Fire Drills.”  Please no disrespect to said cultural group intended here, howwvwer do keep in mind the frantic, scattered, and fundamentally useless activity engendered therein.  Nothing really serious haa developoed, but there have been a series of minor exercises which have eaten up my writing time like you would not believe.

So… I promise to have some new and interesting for this blog, ere the week is out.  I hope.

I did have an idea, and I have pulled together some VERY nice images for it.  The problem is that once I did all that, the writing muse, who normally sits comfortably on my shoulder eating oatmeal or white chocolate chip cookies and wispering sage in my ear, wispered instead: sweet nothings.  Empasis on the NOTHINGs. 

 And I had to  agree.  Upon reflection, what I had planned to write (maybe) would have been a well-written and nicely structured composition. 

Unfortunately, I think it would also have been dull enough to curl paint off the walls.  No quite what I want to write in my blog.  You see, when I write my blog, I write it as if I am speaking to a group of my friends (yeah, I know… in a pig’s eye; nevertheless, I do like to think the majority of you like me a bit- or, at least, like my writing).  In any case, writing something that is deadly dull is not my idea of what I want to treat my friends/readers to, so…  

I have nothing for you right/write now. 

For this you should be, TRULY, thankful.

On to other things

Fall is falling rapidly up here in our little mountain valley on the edge of the high plains.  Last night’s low was 34.5 F, or about 1.5 C.  Almost a frost.  Curses!!  Double Curses!!!  Fall is here, and yet it feels as if  spring has not yet fully sproinged.  There just was no summer this year – we normally have at least a few weeks of wonderful, body-regenerating, blisteringly hot sunny weather.  Weather that not only does away with  the internal darkness caused by the winter’s photon deficiency, but heats one’s innards to a level sufficient to make it through the cold and darkness to come. 

Not this year!!!

My only hope is that we have a correspondingly off-kilter winter, so that we never get any really cold periods. There often seems to be a cosmic balance that has to be maintained,  and I hope our cool summer is balanced by a mellow and mild winter.

A western meadowlark whose musical call is truly characteristic of our area.  Fortunately, these wonderful little avian dinosaurs have been around all summer, even though it has been cooler than normal.

The western meadowlark whose musical call is truly characteristic of our area. Fortunately, these wonderful little avian dinosaurs have been around all summer, even though it has been cooler than normal.

 

Up coming  speaking events.

I have been invitied, and have accepted the invitation, to speak at the Dallas/Fort Worth Marine Aquarium Society’s  “Next Wave” conference on 27 February, 2010.  My presentation title and content have not been set yet, but I am sure it will be a fun presentation to develop.  I have spoken at a couple of previous iterations of this event, about 10 or so years ago, and at the MACNA that the DFW society sponsored and both were great, so I am quite looking forward to this one as well.

Not much else to discuss for now,

So until the next time,

Cheers!!!

A Nubbin Of Information

August 24th, 2009

Back To Writing

After the giant squid post, or rather the giant post about squids, I thought I was entitled to a bit of a rest so, I took a couple of weeks off from blogging, but now I am back.  For a while, I will do a few smaller posts to fill the space whilst I am doing photo prepping for the next larger blog entry.

Domestication

A short time ago I came across this article:

Driscoll, C. A., D. W. Macdonald and S. J. O’Brien. 2009. From wild animals to domestic pets, an evolutionary view of domestication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106:9971-9978.

The link takes you to a page where you may download a free pdf of the article.  It is a very interesting article, the second by the same group on the domestication of pets.  The first articles was this one: 

Driscoll, C. A., M. Menotti-Raymond, A. L. Roca, K. Hupe, W. E. Johnson, E. Geffen, E. H. Harley, M. Delibes, D. Pontier, A. C. Kitchener, N. Yamaguchi, S. J. O’Brien and D. W. Macdonald. 2007. The Near Eastern Origin of Cat Domestication. Science. 317:519-523.

As the articles indicate, the evolutionary ancestor of the house cat was the Eurasian wild cat, Felis silvestris.  

Both of the articles are clearly written and easy to read and are worth spending some time looking at.

Cat Domestication

In the two articles, the researchers describe the evidence leading to the conclusion that the evolutionary precursor of today’s house cat is  the wild cat of Eurasia/Africa.  If you click on the Felis silvestris link above, you will get to a Tree of Life page that describes the cat and has a gallery of images.  It is easy to see that there is really no significant morphological difference between the wild cat and the domestic tabby. 

The second article describes the domestication of dogs and cats, and contrasts the two processes.  The authors note that dogs were likely the first animals domesticated by humans, a process that occurred at least 15,000 years ago.  The authors continue to note that there is an array of dog breeds. some very ancient, such as the mastiff, which are hardly changed from their wolf ancestors, to breeds such as the border collie, which are very recently developed  and have been subject to a great deal of artificial selection.  A recent presentation at the recent annual meeting of the  American Psychological Association indicated that the latter breed, and a few others,  are spectacularly intelligent, at least as intelligent as a human toddler, or substantially smarter than a typical beginning college freshman.   These dogs are truly a testimonial to selective breeding and “artificial” selection.  About the college freshman… well, the less said the better; most are obviously a failing of the necessary culling of the gene pool.

The authorse continue to discuss the ”domestication” of cats.  Cats, it turns out, were one of, if not the last animals to become associated with humans in prehistoric times.  They seem to have been consistently found with humans starting about 7,000 to 8,000 years ago.  However, the pattern of cat domestication was markedly and significantly different from that of dogs or any other human domesticated animal.  It appears that the cats initiated the process, probably by hanging around human encampments until they were “regulars” at the campfire. After that, until very recently, there is no real evidence that humans specifically and systematically attempted to  alter their genome through artificial selection.  Rather, it appears as if there was a co-evolution of humans and felines together.

In essence, cats chose human companionship and then continued to remain around humans until they were accepted as part of the extended “animal” family.  

Put another way, humans domesitcated and altered dogs.  Cats and humans evolved together, at the cats instigaton.  So, without too much exageration, it may be said that cats domesticated humans. 

On that note of profound human superiority….

Until later,

Cheers!

It Happened One Night…

August 13th, 2009
 
In The Morning
About 25 years ago I was teaching Marine Invertebrate Zoology at the Bamfield Marine Station (the name has been since changed to the Bamfield Marine Science Centre), a university-run marine teaching and research laboratory facility on the Canadian west coast.  This facility is located on the shores of Bamfield Inlet, a small embayment on the south side of Barkley Sound near the southwest corner of Vancouver Island.  The course ran from late April until early June and was supposed to be a total immersion course – the students lived, breathed, ate, slept, and dreamed about invertebrates.  In this year, by late May, I was casting around for something of special interest for the students to work on, something above and beyond the “standard” course offerings.
This map shows the spawning region- in white - in Barkley Sound on the southwest side of Vancouver Island for the one night's spawning described in this essay.  Modified from a Google Earth image.

This map shows the spawning region- in white - in Barkley Sound on the southwest side of Vancouver Island for the one night's spawning described in this essay. Modified from a Google Earth image.

For about a week, we had been seeing a few squids swimming near the water’s surface next to the dock.  This was unusual, so I decided to go diving and see if I could see what they were up to.  These animals were Loligo opalescens, the “Pacific Market Squid” harvested in huge numbers near Monterey, California for calamari.  At the time, the southern populations were pretty well known, but not much was known about the northern populations. The local lore was that the squids, occasionally, would spawn in the inlet.  If spawning was to occur, I thought it would be nice to document this for a couple of reasons.  First – it would be ultimately cool to be in a squid spawning aggregation.  Second – I thought I might get some nice images that I could use in lectures.  Third – I thought I might be able to interest a few of the students in doing some actual research on some small aspect of the spawning.  All-in-all, if I could carry it off, it would be a win-win-win situation.  The only problem was trying to predict when the  animals would spawn, and then coming up with a scientifically valid short research project.

Prior to this one particular morning, we had been seeing a few scattered squids near the surface in the inlet.  These surface-swimming animals were fully-grown, about 30 cm (1 foot) long, and bright white, so they were quite evident in the dark water of the inlet.  About 10 o’clock, after my lecture for the day was over, I wandered down to the dock, and noticed that the squids were present in larger than “normal” shoals, maybe up to 30 to 50 animals in each fast moving school, so I thought this would be worth a look.  I asked around and found a dive partner and dock tender, and we plopped ourselves in the water about 30 minutes after 10 AM.  To document our dive, I took along my underwater camera system, which consisted of an Olympus OM-2 in an Ikelite housing, with two strobes attached; one triggered by the camera and the other slaved to the first one.  The film was Kodachrome-64, my film of choice for underwater photography.

Dropping down to the bottom, at a depth of about 17m to 18 m (55-60 ft), we found a small mass of squids in a frenzy of activity.  As a result, I started my personal frenzy of activity taking some images.  It soon became evident that a couple of individuals were spawning, but that most of the animals were just “interested” observers, squid voyeurs, I guess.  I documented a solitary female spawning and depositing her egg capsules.  I presumed copulation had already taken place, as I saw no obvious mating activity.  I had seen movies of some squid spawning aggregations, and it was obvious that what we were watching was not a normal spawning event.  However, I thought it might be a precursor to the “real” action.     

A solitary Loligo, about 30 cm long.

A solitary Loligo, about 30 cm long.

 
A solitary female depositing a egg capsule, which is barely visible between her arms.

A solitary female depositing a egg capsule, which is barely visible between her arms.

 

The same female as above, the egg capsule is now clearly visable, note the attachment strand at the free end. She will wrap the strand around some object to anchor the capsule to the substrate.

The same female as above, the egg capsule is now clearly visable, note the attachment strand at the free end. She will wrap the strand around some object to anchor the capsule to the substrate.

 
Comin' right at ya!!!  The attachment strand is now clearly visible.

Comin' right at ya!!! The attachment strand is now clearly visible.

A cluster of egg capsules presumably deposited by one Loligo female.

A cluster of egg capsules presumably deposited by one Loligo female.

 
That Night
For about the prevoius week, some of the people of the village of Bamfield had been catching squid by jigging for them near the government-owned docks in town.  So, after seeing the events off of the laboratory dock, I thought that there might be a small mass spawning event occurring near the dock in the upcoming evening.  It would be a “small” event simply because the area was constrained.  The inlet was not wide and was relatively shallow, about 18 m (60 ft) deep at its maximum in that area.  I arranged for another dive buddy and boat tender and we went down to the town docks about 10:30 pm to do our dive.  As usual, I took my camera system along to document interesting “happenings.”

When we arrived at the scene, the fishermen already there said that jigging was “slow.”  Squids were visible, but sparse, and not many had come into the area where the fishermen were.  To avoid upsetting the fishermen, we dove well away from them.  This also prevented us from being “jigged.”  Having a sharp squid jig tear open and flood one’s (very) expensive dry suit can really ruin the experience of the moment!

When we first got into the water, few Loligo were around, but within a couple of minutes they started to aggregate around us, probably attracted by our diving lights, and the large pile of rocks on the bottom nearby.  At first there were just a few solitary individuals, then a few doublets, and then quartets, and then … large groups; Too large and too fast to count.  All of a sudden the action began.

Single squid approaching the spawning area.

Single squid approaching the spawning area.

Here comes a quartet!

Here comes a quartet!

The "Eyes" have it.

The "Eyes" have it.

A pair heading for the action!

A pair heading for the action!

Although the spawning aggregation appeared terribly chaotic, with thousands – yes, thousands – of Loligo jetting around from all directions and bumping into each other and us, after a bit of observation, it became clear that what appeared to be an unruly affair was really quite well “choreographed.” 

 From the top and outside of the spawning mayhem in toward the bottom…

The animals approached the spawning site alone or in small groups of up to about ten individuals.  As they approached they had normal coloration; brown to reddish brown tones predominated on the bodies and the arms’ outer surfaces. 

At the outermost region of the spawning site, about 5 to 6 m (15 to 20 feet) above it, the individuals were actively fighting with one another to find a mate.  Females were “attacked” by males that wished to mate with them, and often two or more males fought each other for each female.  This was a brutal, winner-take-all, competition!  Skin was ripped off and the combatants used their beaks to rip pieces of flesh from their opponents.  The females were NOT passive participants in this rough foreplay; they were actively fighting as well.  Presumably, the strongest, most fit male prevailed.  During this activity, both males and females were white.  They did not flash or change colors. 

Two males and one female Loligo in premating behavior.

Two males and one female Loligo in premating behavior.

Precopulatory behavior, note the bites taken out of the male's arms.

Precopulatory behavior, note the bites taken out of the male's arms.

A male almost in the mating posture.

A male almost in the mating posture.

As the combat continued, the participants got closer and closer to the bottom, and eventually one male prevailed.  He got into the oviposition position; holding the female from behind and below, with his eight arms wrapped around her.  Copulation, the transfer of a spermatophore (sperm packet) from the male to the female, occurred once this posture was stabilized.  The animals were now about 3 m (10 feet) above the bottom.  Once he was securely holding his mate, the male’s color pattern changed from pure white all over, to having a white body and reddish-brown tentacles.  The female remained totally white.  Once this color pattern was established all other males avoided the pair, and ceased jostling the resident male for possession of his female.  I suspect the color pattern change was THE signal that mating had occurred and that this particular female was no longer available. 

A spawning pair above a large capsule mass.

A spawning pair above a large capsule mass.

Depositing egg capsules.  The male is to the rear.

Depositing egg capsules. The male is to the rear. Egg capsule deposition!

The spawning frenzy; everybody's moving!!!
The spawning frenzy; everybody’s moving!!!
The egg capsule deposition can continue for many hours!

The egg capsule deposition can continue for many hours!

After the male’s color changed, he did all of the subsequent swimming for the pair.  He moved the female to the oviposition site and began to push her into the mass of egg capsules that were already at the site.  As they approached the site, the female extruded and formed an egg capsule which was held in her arms.  Once the male pushed her into the egg capsule mass, or onto any other acceptable area, the female wrapped the distal, adhesive and ropelike, end of the egg capsule around anything, such as other egg capsules, a sunken twig, a rock, a diver’s mask strap, which would hold it in place. 

When first formed, these egg capsules were about the size of one’s little finger, but they became larger as they absorb water.  From subsequent studies, part of the project we later did, I found that each egg capsule in this region contained about 150 eggs, sequestered within a series of protective – and toxic – membranous coverings.  I was unable to count the number of egg capsules produced by any specific single female, the situation was just too chaotic for that.  In the California areas other studies found that each female produced about 20 capsules.  If the same number was produced by these northern Loligo, each female would deposit about 3000 eggs in her one night stand.

After the final capsule was deposited, the male released the female and they both slowly departed the area.  The males seemed to be a bit more active and I surmised that they might try to mate again, as each one produces numerous spermatophores, and they only use one per female..  The females appeared to be totally spent; they swam erratically and weakly.  They often travelled only a short distance prior to settling to the bottom and dying.  The males probably swam a few more hours, at best, but they, too, don’t survive long.  Individuals of both genders are badly injured by the experience.

Post spawning, note the damage.

Post spawning, note the damage.

After spawning.

After spawning.

Damaged...

Damaged...

During the flurry of spawning activity predators made their appearance.  In the area where I was diving these predators were seals and California sea lions which would come blasting through the spawning masses biting up squid as they went.  Fortunately, they decided big ugly divers in rubber suits didn’t match their search image of beautiful, graceful, and tasty raw calamari.  In other areas, larger sharks, such as blue sharks, will also come into the spawning squid schools, but, blissfully, I didn’t see any of those in the aggregations I dove in. 

 After the spawning was over, the bottom was littered with egg capsule masses.  All  cephalopods spawn only once and then die.

Subsequently

Corpses - so many on the bottom that no scavengers will eat them...

Corpses - so many on the bottom that no scavengers will eat them...

Predators, such as this Urticina anemone, were stuffed with squid bodies and would not - probably could not - eat any more of them.

Predators, such as this Urticina anemone, were stuffed with squid bodies and would not - probably could not - eat any more of them.

Over the week following the spawning, some of my associates and students and I did some diving to make measurements of the squid egg masses.  Scattered all over the bottom, from just below lowest low water to beyond diver depth, were small individual egg capsule aggregations.  Each of these covered about 0.3 square meters, (about 3 square feet) and there were about 1.3 of them per square meter (10 square feet).  I collected some of these aggregations, and found that each contained, on the average, about 1,940 capsules.  Each capsule contained about 150 eggs, meaning each capsule mass was the result of 194 squid pairs, and contained 291,000 eggs.

Small egg mass with a sunflower sea star, Pycnopodia helianthoides, on it.  The star was not eating the capsules.

Small egg mass with a sunflower sea star, Pycnopodia helianthoides, on it. The star was about 80 cm (32 inches) in diameter and was not eating the capsules.My diving partner for scale over a large egg capsule mass.

My diving partner for scale over a large egg capsule mass.

My diving partner for scale over a large egg capsule mass.

The large mass photographed with my diving partner above.  We were not able to return to this mass; when we surfaced fog had rolled in and we could not get bearings to return (this was well before GPS).

The large mass photographed with my diving partner above. We were not able to return to this mass; when we surfaced fog had rolled in and we could not get bearings to return (this was well before GPS). The mass was about 1 m (39 inches) deep.

 We did diving surveys to determine the extent of the night’s spawning activity.  This particular night’s spawning aggregation extended along about 11 km (7 miles) of the southern edge of Barkley sound.  The largest egg mass we found in a quantitative survey area was 69 square meters or 742 square feet, however, we saw some much larger egg masses.  Unfortunately, these were seen during the spot surveys for determining the whole area covered by the spawning aggregation, and we could not return to them.  We estimated the largest measured spawning aggregation was result of 24,000 spawning pairs of Loligo, and based our quantitative measurements of small egg mass abundance we estimated that during that one night of spawning, in the Bamfield area, over 64,000,000 squids spawned! 

Loligo opalescens eggs take about six weeks to hatch in the temperatures of that region, and some of the egg masses were casually observed over that period.  After hatching, the remnants of the membranous egg coverings were still noticeable on the bottom for another several weeks in places.  As long as the egg capsule membranes were intact, nothing was seen eating the eggs. 

Stupidly, I did not wear gloves during my initial examination of the egg capsules and the eggs when I was tearing and cutting open the egg capsule membranes.  After a few minutes of handling the membranes my fingers lost feeling, and a few minutes after that my hands became numb and immobile.  The area of numbness continued to expand until finally my arms became numb up to the elbows.  It took about 2 to 3 hours before the feeling slowly returned to my arms and hands.  Obviously, whatever is in the membranes would be effective at deterring predation.  In over 100 diver hours of examining the capsule masses, no animals were seen eating the eggs, although we saw many animals positioned on or in the masses.  If egg capsules were torn or cut open underwater, red rock crab individuals, Cancer productus, rapidly approached and started eating the eggs or developing embryos, further illustrating the protective function of the capsular membranes.  The long decay period for the membranes after the squids had hatched also indicated that the membranes contained either or both antifungal and antibacterial agents.

Relatively new capsules about a week old.  The developing embryos are visible inside them.

Relatively new capsules about a week old. The developing embryos are visible inside them.

Old capsules, about 5 weeks after deposition.

Old capsules, about 5 weeks after deposition. The almost-ready-to-hatch embryos are visible within them. The white spiral objects on the egg capsules are the gelatinous egg strands of the nudibranch seen in the center of the image

 Reference:

Shimek, R. L., D. Fyfe, L. Ramsey, A. Bergey, J. Elliott, and S. Guy.  1984.  A note on the spawning of the north Pacific market squid Loligo opalescens(Berry, 1911) in Barkley Sound, Vancouver Island, Canada.  Fishery Bulletin.  82:445-446.

Don’t Give Up!!!

August 6th, 2009

If you have started checking my blog again after my “blog-hiatus,” and all of a sudden you see that I have quit blogging again, you are probably, and justifiably, thinking that Shimek’s gone off and left the blog again.

If you have thought that, as I said it is justifable.  But it is WRONG!!!! 

What I have been doing is scanning a lot of my unscanned images to use, at least initially, in a blog-essay-article.  I have about 8,000 to 10,000 unscanned underwater photographs.  Most of these are from the areas in the NE Pacific where I did most of my diving.  As such they are not appropriate for most coral reef magazines or columns.  So… over the last 20 years, they have not been scanned.

This is unfortunate because most of them are technically good to excellent quality, and can be used to tell some good “truthful tales.” 

So… I have decided to do a tale or two and because of that I need to do the scanning.  And it can’t be just any scan.  The scans have to be well-done and of high technical quality.  As a result they take a long time to do.

I estimate I will be done with the first batch of images by early next week, and I hope to publish the first essay shortly thereafter. 

So.  Please!!   Don’t give up hope.  Check back, I promise some good stuff’s coming!!

Until then,

Cheers!!!

That Time Of Night

July 22nd, 2009

Finished!

The article is done and at the editor’s – or at least the emails containing it and the images have disappeared from my mail box.  Whew!   That was a long one, mostly because of the images.  Over the years I have spent quite a little time upgrading images for laboratory handouts.  When I quit teaching and started writing, I segued these handout images into article ones with varying amounts of success.  The present article was about sea squirts, and the general tunicate image seen in basic texts as well as advanced ones world wide is pretty much what I used. 

Seriously, everybody uses the same image with small variations.  Presumably, some scientist did the first one as part of a research article, but it is really hard to backtrack on these things and find the original.  For a different animal group whose name I cannot for the life of me recall, I once did just that.  I took the image from a text I was using and spent about half a day at the University of Washington library going back in time by looking through old journals and texts trying to track down the original of the image.  And eventually I did.  It was published in a research paper in the 1930s, and wow… it looked almost nothing like the standard issue of the 1990s (when I did the search).   The original was one of those classic old style illustrations with detail to the nth degree, shading and true-to-life perspective.  The 1990 standard issue was  a simplified outline, not so much like a Cliff’s Notes version of a Shakespeare play, as more like a cartoon version of a Rembrandt.  So much was lost…

So… for this article I tried to do a good  generalized illustration.  It still has the cartoon style to some extent – the simplification is necessary to allow all the salient structures to be illustrated.   But the whole thing looks a lot better, I think.  However, I am still not satisfied with it.  I don’t know exactly what I will do with it, but it will be modified if I ever do another article on squirts.   Here is a low res version of the main illustration:

Tunicate Innards...

Tunicate Innards...

So my verdict after many hours of work.  Not bad…  But not as good as I wanted.  A reader might ask, “Why not simply use some images of dissected animals?”  Well, I would reply… here is an image of a dissected squirt.

Labeled dissection of a specimen of Styela montereyensis.

Labeled dissection of a specimen of Styela montereyensis.

This is an image I made of a dissection made by one of my students about 6 years ago.  It is all right for a dissection, but to show anybody else a lot of detail… well, it could be done, with a lot of work and a hugely enlarged image.  However, the wonderful thing about a good diagrammatic illustration is that one can show generalized relationships – and show a lot of things that are obscure in the real critter, such as in this case, darn near everything.  If you know what you’re looking at you can tell what it is.  In other words a good student should be able to puzzle their way through the image.  But for some poor person who is just reading the article for some detailed background information the actual dissection might actually obscure things more than make them clear.

So much work, and yet the results aren’t really there yet.  Sigh. 

Well, that’s about it for tonight or this morning, take your pick.  It is about 1:30 a m and I am up, having been woken up by a splitting headache.  So, I popped a couple of aspirin and had a glass of milk, and now I am about ready to re-try horizontality.

Until later,

Cheers!!!

Simply Amazing…

July 19th, 2009

It is simply amazin’ how much time it takes to write an article for ReefLife – or any decent magazine, I suppose.  I really wish I was being paid by the hour rather than by the article.  Sigh!  That will never occur!  I think I have probably put in close to 120 hours on this one, counting illustrations – and, of course, one must count illustrations.  For this one I have drawn three quite complex images, two of the insides of a typical sea squirt and one of a tadpole larva.  Now, these are rather standard invertebrate zoology illustrations, and it is easy to copy them from any number of sources, and I have more-or-less done that in previous articles about these critters, by simply using the illustrations from my laboratory hand outs. 

Not this time!  First, I wanted a higher quality illustration, in color and with some indication of shading and perspective to give a feeling for the three-dimensionality of the animal.  Second, I wanted the illustration to reflect my knowledge, not someone else’s ideas.  So, I read a lot of the basic informaion again to make sure I was doing it correctly and then I threw caution to the winds and started in.  And lo… I discovered that I had forgotten a great deal about how my Coreldraw 8 program worked.   Oops…

So, what should have taken me a few hours took instead more than a few days.  Ah well, the images look good – and they are accurate, and they are MINE.  And to see them, dear reader, you will have to look at them in the magazine ’cause I am not posting them here.

Just so you won’t feel cheated though, here is an image of a small portion of the branchial basket of the tunicate, Styela montereyensis

Gill Slits in the branchial basket of <em>Styela</em> <em>montereyensis</em>. .

Gill Slits in the branchial basket of Styela montereyensis.

The squirt uses the branchial basket as its way to construct a filter-feeding net out of mucus.  The branchial basket supports the net and cilia on the edges of the gill silts pull water through it, so the animal can collect food.  And for those of you who don’t know this wonderful animal, here is an image of it.

The stalked tunicates in this image at the top center and near the middle are <em>Styela</em> <em>montereyensis</em>.   They are about 10 cm (4 inches) tall.

The stalked tunicates in this image at the top center and near the middle are Styela montereyensis. . They are about 10 cm (4 inches) tall.

Except for a couple of sea anemones, and a patch or two of hydrocoral, everything that is visible in this image is a tunicate.  This image was taken in Barkley Sound on Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada about 20 years ago.

Enjoy,

Until next time,

Cheers!!!

Writing And Editing Responsibility

July 14th, 2009

One of the topics being heartily discussed in several of the blogs in the Science Blogs group is the writing and reporting of scientific information for the general public.  The general consensus seems to be that while there are some good sources, most reports dealing with scientific findings are reported distastrously poorly.  In most cases headlines are inaccurate and the body of the article isn’t much better.  This has a couple of severe side effects;  first, it presents inaccurate information.  Second, it acts to ensure that the general public continues to misunderstand and distrust science. 

Not surprisingly the same trend is apparent in the reef aquarium literature.  I was a technical editor for the previous American publisher of Coral magazine.  Coral is basically a knockoff of Daniel Knop’s Koralle, which is, of course, published wholly in German.   It started to be published in English/American about 6 years ago, and I was involved with the first 5 years of it.  When the first publisher decided not to continue publishing it, my association with the magazine ended.  So, what I tell you here is probably not what happens in the present version of Coral.   

When an issue was being prepared for publication, I would be sent those articles that the managing editor deemed in my areas of expertise.  These articles and columns were mostly science and invertebrate oriented, and occasionally some other things.   In most cases the articles were already translated, except for technical terms, which I would translate.   My task was to massage these pieces and put them into a form that was understandable.  Also I had to ensure that scientific information in the articles was presented accurately and well. 

AND WOW, Was that latter task a problem!! 

The science presented in the magazine’s  articles ran the gamut from excellent (Dieter Brockman’s articles) to well worse than awful (several authors, including one or two semi-regulars).   For the good stuff, editing was a breeze – I just “tightened up” the translations to remove excess wordiness, and that was that. 

For the bad stuff…  well, in most cases we could salvage the article, although if memory serves, I suggested that we deep-six a couple of articles, and the managing editor agreed with me.  The problem was to try to understand what the author was saying, often not an easy task, and then correcting the factual errors, and, if possible, trying to keep the author’s message and tone intact.

The point here is that I am, in this case, acting as a journalist, but one with an earned doctorate in the marine sciences along with several decades of research experience.  I COULD verify the facts and the arguments and, on many occasions, I spent a significant amount of time and effort doing just that.  Most editors could not and would not.   The net result is that we produced a readable, scientifically accurate, publication – which in several cases was a distinct improvement on the original!!   I have no idea if a similar process is in effect with the current publishers of Coral, but if it isn’t, it should be.   The problem is that if the content of Koralle is simply accepted as is, and edited simply for the English, there will be a lot of errors in the magazine’s content; which, of course, most of the readers will probably not catch. 

Ah well… 

Images

The software for the blog had been having some glitches for the past several months, but as I wasn’t writing much, I figured I could live with them.  The most important of these was that I could not upload images from my computer.  Since I have decided to become a frequent blogger, I checked with my webmaster, and he tackled the problem.   I think he has have fixed those problems, so in closing I will leave you with a bit of eye candy, a ghostly version of the common, but still beautiful, fairy slipper orchid.

Calypso bulbosa, The Fairy Slipper Orchid

Calypso bulbosa, The Fairy Slipper Orchid

Until next time,

Cheers!!